Chatbot Conversation Writing
Chatbot Conversation Writing
Overview
A chatbot is a conversation, not an interface. Every turn the bot takes should advance the user’s goal or surface a clear next move. The work breaks into three layers:
- Persona — who the bot is, what it sounds like, what it refuses to do.
- Turn design — the individual response, plus the choices it offers.
- Recovery design — what happens when the bot doesn’t understand, when the user is angry, or when the conversation has to leave the bot.
Core Concepts
1. Cooper-Reeves conversational design
The four Gricean maxims:
- Quantity — say as much as is needed, not more
- Quality — only say true things
- Relation — stay on the user’s topic
- Manner — be clear, brief, and orderly
2. Persona consistency
A minimum persona doc includes:
- Name (or explicit no-name policy)
- Role (what the bot is for — support? sales? in-product help?)
- Voice traits (3–5 adjectives — e.g., “warm, precise, never cute”)
- Refuses to do (e.g., diagnose medical issues, take payment, promise pricing)
- Vocabulary (3–5 words it uses; 3–5 it doesn’t)
- Disclosure boilerplate (the exact “I’m an AI assistant” line)
- Escalation trigger phrases
3. The “no, I’m not human” disclosure rule (2024–2026 norms)
As of 2026, plain-and-unambiguous AI disclosure is no longer optional:
- California SB 243 (effective Jan 1, 2026) requires disclosure, plus reminders every three hours for minor users
- EU AI Act requires upfront disclosure for any AI system interacting with natural persons
- FTC treats undisclosed AI as potentially deceptive
Writing implications:
- Disclose in the first turn, not buried in a tooltip
- Use direct language: “I’m an AI assistant” — not “I’m an enhanced automation experience”
- If asked “are you a human?” answer plainly: “No, I’m an AI assistant.”
4. Turn-taking conventions
A conversational turn has three jobs:
- Acknowledge what the user just said
- Resolve the user’s intent
- Hand the turn back with a clear next move
Length convention: 1–3 short sentences per turn for support bots, 1–5 sentences for in-product help.
5. The graceful-confusion pattern
When the bot doesn’t understand, three things must happen:
- Admit it cleanly. “I’m not sure what you mean by ‘reset’.”
- Offer a small, finite menu. Two or three concrete interpretations.
- Provide a path out. Always include “talk to a human” no later than the second failed understanding.
6. Fallback hierarchies
| Tier | Trigger | Response |
|---|---|---|
| T1: Clarify | Low-confidence intent match | “Did you mean X or Y?” |
| T2: Reframe | Two failed clarifications | “I can help with A, B, or C. Which is closest?” |
| T3: Offer human | Three failed turns, or angry-sentiment trigger | “Let me get a human on this.” |
| T4: Hard escalation | Keywords: fraud, emergency, refund, account locked | Immediate handoff |
7. Brand-voice-in-bot transfer
Three transfer rules:
- Drop the edge in failure modes. Humor in a working flow is fine. Humor when the user is locked out is not.
- Keep the rhythm, simplify the vocabulary.
- Reuse hero phrases sparingly. One signature phrase per conversation.
8. Escalation-to-human prose
Three elements must be present:
- Confirm the handoff is happening. “I’m connecting you to a person now.”
- Preserve context. “I’ll share what we’ve discussed so you won’t have to repeat yourself.”
- Set the wait expectation. “Average wait is about 4 minutes.”
Anti-Patterns
- The “I’m an enhanced automation experience” dodge. Coy disclosure reads as deceptive.
- The infinite “I didn’t understand, please rephrase” loop. Two failures is the ceiling; escalate.
- The hidden escalation path. Surface the escalation in the conversation itself.
- The promise-the-bot-can’t-keep. “I’ll refund you” when refund authority is human-only.
References
- Erika Hall, Conversational Design (A Book Apart, 2018).
- California SB 243 (Companion Chatbot Disclosure Act), effective Jan 1, 2026.
- EU AI Act Article 50 (transparency obligations for AI systems).
- Byron Reeves and Clifford Nass, The Media Equation (CSLI / Cambridge, 1996).