# exo stuck-runner 90-second no-progress watchdog (PR 2370) > exo PR 2370, "fix(worker): restart a runner that is stuck mid-generation" (commit de99629, opened 2026-10-01 by AlexCheema), stops a runner that has said nothing for 90 seconds while its instance has a text generation in flight. Parent: [Mac local LLMs: Clusters, RDMA, exo and ds4](https://llms-explorer.com/tree/mac-local-llms-clusters-rdma-exo-ds4/) · 1 facets · 31 facts · page: https://llms-explorer.com/tree/exo-stuck-runner-90-second-no-progress-watchdog/ ## Facts - exo PR 2370, "fix(worker): restart a runner that is stuck mid-generation" (commit de99629, opened 2026-10-01 by AlexCheema), stops a runner that has said nothing for 90 seconds while its instance has a text generation in flight. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370) - New constants: `RUNNER_WATCH_INTERVAL = 5.0` and `RUNNER_STALL_TIMEOUT = 90.0`. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370.diff) - The supervisor keeps `_last_heard`, set to `anyio.current_time()` at construction and refreshed on every event the supervisor forwards from the runner (inside `_forward_events`, before any other handling). Any event counts as a word, not only tokens. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370.diff) - `_stuck()` is true only when all four hold: `bound_shard.device_rank == 0`, `status` is `RunnerRunning`, at least one `TextGeneration` task is in `in_progress`, and `now - _last_heard > RUNNER_STALL_TIMEOUT`. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370.diff) - When `_stuck()` fires, `_watch_runner` calls `_check_runner(RuntimeError("Runner made no progress for 90s while generating"))`. This reuses the same failure path as PR 2367: in-flight requests get an `ErrorChunk`, the status becomes `RunnerFailed`, peers are shut down and runners are recreated with backoff. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370.diff) - Only rank 0 is judged because only the first rank reports tokens and prefill progress; the other ranks are silent in normal operation. Stopping rank 0 brings the whole instance down and back. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370) - The PR argues 90 s is far outside normal behaviour: a generating runner reports a token every decode step and progress every prefill chunk, including remote prefill, "even for the largest models". — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370) - Only generation tasks arm the watchdog. Loading, warm-up and idle runners are not judged, since the check needs a `TextGeneration` task in `in_progress`. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370.diff) - Because the check runs every 5 s, the realistic stop time is between 90 and 95 s after the last event. — source: `asserted` - The target causes in the PR text: a process that is alive but stuck (blocked on I/O, frozen by the OS, deadlocked), a transport that stops delivering without an error, and ranks that disagree about the batch so one waits for data the other never sends. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370) - Stack dumps of stuck runners in chaos runs "showed ranks waiting in different collectives of the same decode step". — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370) - It complements PR 2367, which catches the case where MLX prints the ring abort; PR 2370 catches the silent cases where nothing is printed. — source: `asserted` - PR 2370 alone is not enough for recovery. When a runner is stuck, the worker's plan loop waits forever for it to acknowledge the next task, so that node never shuts the stuck runner down. With only this PR, in-flight requests end with an error after 90 s but the instance stays stuck and none of the requests started in the next 5 minutes completed. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370) - The PR says to merge it with PR 2348 ("a busy runner no longer holds up every other model on the node"), which stops the planner from waiting on generation-task acknowledgements. With 2348 and the other open reliability PRs, 384 requests completed starting 115 s after a freeze and the frozen runner was killed. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370) - Freeze test: 2 Mac Studios (96 GB), Llama-3.2-3B as a 2-node pipeline, 3 clients; the second rank's runner was frozen with SIGSTOP mid-generation and left frozen. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370) - Three-hour chaos run on 5 M3 Ultra 512 GB Mac Studios (Qwen3.8-27B as a 2-node pipeline, 12 clients): without the PR a pipeline instance stopped producing tokens 3 times with no fault injected and 8 requests hung until the client gave up after 5 minutes; with it (plus PR 2369) the watchdog fired 5 times, each time in-flight requests ended with an error, runners were recreated, the instance served again about 1.5 to 2 minutes after it stopped, and no request hung. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370) - A rank-1 runner that dies or hangs by itself is not caught by this check; it is caught only through rank 0 going silent when the pipeline stalls. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370.diff) - Tests: a silent first-rank runner mid-generation is stopped and reported `RunnerFailed` with an `ErrorChunk`; a runner that keeps updating `_last_heard` is left alone; a rank-1 supervisor is never stopped for silence. The first test "fails without this change". Tests shrink the two constants to 0.01 s and 0.05 s. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370.diff) - Related side finding: PR 2348's measurement on one M3 Ultra 96 GB showed that sharing a GPU between two models costs almost nothing (1B time to first token 0.38 to 0.40 s with the 3B model busy versus 0.23 s alone), while a second 3B request queued behind a 30k-token prefill made the 1B request wait 15.1 to 15.7 s on main because the worker's plan loop blocked on `start_task`. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2348) - Fast synch and the watchdog. PR 2377 reports the watchdog fired 5 times in a 3-hour chaos run with fast synch on and 0 times with it off for ring instances, so the stalls the watchdog catches may partly be a fast-synch effect; PR 2370 attributes them to unmatched collectives of unknown cause ("causes not all found yet"). The two runs differ in node count (5 and 3). — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2377) - Whether 90 s is too short for a very long remote prefill that sends no progress event. The PR says progress is reported every prefill chunk, but no source gives the chunk time on the largest contexts. — source: `asserted` - Whether the PR merged. The cached page shows open dependencies (PR 2348, 2369) and no merge event. — source: `asserted` - exo PR 2370 sets `RUNNER_STALL_TIMEOUT` to 90 seconds and `RUNNER_WATCH_INTERVAL` to 5 seconds. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370.diff) - The stall check applies only to the supervisor of device rank 0, only while status is `RunnerRunning`, and only while a `TextGeneration` task is in progress. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370.diff) - The supervisor refreshes `_last_heard` on every event it receives from the runner, so any event resets the 90-second clock. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370.diff) - A stall raises `RuntimeError("Runner made no progress for 90s while generating")` into `_check_runner`. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370.diff) - Without PR 2348, PR 2370 ends stuck requests with an error after 90 s but the instance does not recover, because the other node's plan loop waits forever on the stuck runner. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370) - With PR 2348 and the other reliability PRs, a SIGSTOP-frozen rank-1 runner was killed and the instance recreated itself, completing 384 requests starting 115 seconds after the freeze. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370) - In a 3-hour 5-node chaos run the watchdog fired 5 times, each recovery took about 1.5 to 2 minutes and no request hung; without it, 3 no-fault stalls left 8 requests hanging for 5 minutes. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370) - Stack dumps of stuck exo runners showed the two pipeline ranks waiting in different collectives of the same decode step. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2370) - On one M3 Ultra, a busy 3B model delayed a 1B model's time to first token by about 0.15 s; the 15 s delay seen on main came from the worker's `start_task` acknowledgement wait, not from GPU sharing. — [source](https://github.com/exo-explore/exo/pull/2348)